Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The presenting characteristics of erythema migrans vary by age, sex, duration, and body location

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The erythema migrans (EM) skin lesion is often the first clinical sign of Lyme disease. Significant variability in EM presenting characteristics such as shape, color, pattern, and homogeneity, has been reported. We studied associations between these presenting characteristics, as well as whether they were associated with age, sex, EM duration, body location, and initiation of antibiotics.

Methods

Two hundred and seventy one adult participants with early Lyme disease who had a physician-diagnosed EM skin lesion of ≥ 5 cm in diameter and ≤ 72 h of antibiotic treatment were enrolled. Participant demographics, clinical characteristics, and characteristics of their primary EM lesion were recorded.

Results

After adjusting for potential confounders, EM size increased along with increasing EM duration to a peak of 14 days. Male EM were found to be on average 2.18 cm larger than female EM. The odds of a red (vs blue/red) EM were 65% lower in males compared to females, and were over 3 times as high for EM found on the pelvis, torso, or arm compared to the leg. Age remained a significant predictor of central clearing in adjusted models; for every 10-year increase in age, the odds of central clearing decreased 25%.

Conclusions

Given that EM remains a clinical diagnosis, it is essential that both physicians and the general public are aware of its varied manifestations. Our findings suggest possible patterns within this variability, with implications for prompt diagnosis and treatment initiation, as well as an understanding of the clinical spectrum of EM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The code generated for analyses during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Steere AC, Strle F, Wormser GP, Hu LT, Branda JA, Hovius JW, et al. Lyme borreliosis. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2016;2:16090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Steere AC, Sikand VK. The presenting manifestations of Lyme disease and the outcomes of treatment. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2472–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marques A, Schwartz I, Wormser GP, Wang Y, Hornung RL, Demirkale CY, et al. Transcriptome assessment of erythema migrans skin lesions in patients with early Lyme disease reveals predominant interferon signaling. J Infect Dis. 2018;217:158–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nadelman RB, Nowakowski J, Forseter G, Goldberg NS, Bittker S, Cooper D, et al. The clinical spectrum of early Lyme borreliosis in patients with culture-confirmed erythema migrans. Am J Med. 1996;100:502–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wormser GP, McKenna D, Carlin J, Nadelman RB, Cavaliere LF, Holmgren D, et al. Brief communication: hematogenous dissemination in early Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:751–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tibbles CD, Edlow JA. Does this patient have erythema migrans? JAMA. 2007;297:2617–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nadelman RB. Erythema migrans. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2015;29:211–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dandache P, Nadelman RB. Erythema migrans. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2008;22:235–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme Disease (Borrelia burgdorferi) 2017 Case Definition. 2017. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/lyme-disease/case-definition/2017/.

  10. Smith RP, Schoen RT, Rahn DW, Sikand VK, Nowakowski J, Parenti DL, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of early Lyme disease in patients with microbiologically confirmed erythema migrans. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:421–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger BW. Dermatologic manifestations of Lyme disease. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11:S1475–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg NS, Forseter G, Nadelman RB, Schwartz I, Jorde U, McKenna D, et al. Vesicular erythema migrans. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:1495–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zajkowska J, Hermanowska-Szpakowicz T, Coyle P, Ostrowska J, Pancewicz S, Kondrusik M. Comparative study of early lyme disease: Erythema migrans in New York State and Northeastern Poland. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8.

  14. Mazori DR, Orme CM, Mir A, Meehan SA, Neimann AL. Vesicular erythema migrans: an atypical and easily misdiagnosed form of Lyme disease. Dermatol Online J. 2015;21.

  15. Strle F, Nadelman RB, Cimperman J, Nowakowski J, Picken RN, Schwartz I, et al. Comparison of culture-confirmed erythema migrans caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto in New York State and by Borrelia afzelii in Slovenia. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:32–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strle F, Ružić-Sabljić E, Logar M, Maraspin V, Lotrič-Furlan S, Cimperman J, et al. Comparison of erythema migrans caused by Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia garinii. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:1253–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Melski JW, Reed KD, Mitchell PD, Barth GD. Primary and secondary erythema migrans in central Wisconsin. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:709–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaw AC, Goldstein DR, Montgomery RR. Age-dependent dysregulation of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:875–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16:626–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, Halperin JJ, Steere AC, Klempner MS, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1089–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Steere AC, Bartenhagen NH, Craft JE, Hutchinson GJ, Newman JH, Rahn DW, et al. The early clinical manifestations of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:76–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Edlow J. Erythema migrans. Med Clin N Am. 2002;86:239–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Asbrink E, Olsson I. Clinical manifestations of erythema chronicum migrans Afzelius in 161 patients. A comparison with Lyme disease. Acta Derm Venereol. 1985;65:43–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boršič K, Blagus R, Cerar T, Strle F, Stupica D. Clinical course, serologic response, and long-term outcome in elderly patients with early Lyme borreliosis. J Clin Med. 2018;7:506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirsch AG, Herman RJ, Rebman A, Moon KA, Aucott J, Heaney C, et al. Obstacles to diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease in the USA: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e021367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aucott JN, Crowder LA, Yedlin V, Kortte KB. Bull’s-Eye and nontarget skin lesions of Lyme disease: an internet survey of identification of erythema migrans. Dermatol Res Pr. 2012;451727.

  27. Nadelman RB, Wormser GP. Recognition and treatment of erythema migrans: are we off target? Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:477–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weitzner E, Visintainer P, Wormser GP. Comparison of males versus females with culture-confirmed early Lyme disease at presentation and at 11–20 years after diagnosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:493–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwarzwalder A, Schneider MF, Lydecker A, Aucott JN. Sex differences in the clinical and serologic presentation of early Lyme disease: results from a retrospective review. Gend Med. 2010;7:320–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bennet L, Stjernberg L, Berglund J. Effect of gender on clinical and epidemiologic features of Lyme borreliosis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007;7:34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aw D, Silva AB, Palmer DB. Immunosenescence: emerging challenges for an ageing population. Immunology. 2007;435–436

  32. Aucott J, Morrison C, Munoz B, Rowe PC, Schwarzwalder A, West SK. Diagnostic challenges of early Lyme disease: lessons from a community case series. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wormser GP, Masters E, Nowakowski J, McKenna D, Holmgren D, Ma K, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of patients from Missouri and New York with erythema migrans-like skin lesions. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:958–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kannangara DW, Patel P. Report of non-lyme, erythema migrans rashes from New Jersey with a review of possible role of tick salivary toxins. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018;18:641–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schwartz AM, Hinckley AF, Mead PS, Hook SA, Kugeler KJ. Surveillance for Lyme disease—United States, 2008–2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lester JC, Taylor SC, Chren M-M. Under-representation of skin of colour in dermatology images: not just an educational issue. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180:1521–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dennison R, Novak C, Rebman A, Venkatesan A, Aucott J. Lyme disease with erythema migrans and seventh nerve palsy in an African-American man. Cureus. 2019;11:e6509.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the physicians of Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Park Medical Associates, Patient First, and Centennial Medical Group who participated in recruitment for this study. We are grateful to the research participants who contributed their time and effort towards this study. This work was supported by a subagreement from the Johns Hopkins University with funds provided by a Grant Agreement from the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation. Support was also provided from the Global Lyme Alliance (GLA) and the Bay Area Lyme Foundation (BALF). This publication was also made possible by the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), which is funded in part by Grant Number UL1 TR003098 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, and the Johns Hopkins Clinical Research Network (JHCRN). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the Johns Hopkins ICTR, JHCRN, NCATS, NIH, the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation, GLA, or BALF.

Funding

This work was supported by a subagreement from the Johns Hopkins University with funds provided by a Grant Agreement from the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation. Support was also provided from the Global Lyme Alliance (GLA) and the Bay Area Lyme Foundation (BALF). This publication was also made possible by the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), which is funded in part by Grant Number UL1 TR003098 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, and the Johns Hopkins Clinical Research Network (JHCRN). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the Johns Hopkins ICTR, JHCRN, NCATS, NIH, the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation, GLA, or BALF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection was performed by AR, EM, CN, DP, SG, and JA. Data analyses were performed by TY and AR. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AR and TY. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John N. Aucott.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Aucott and Yang, and Mses. Rebman, Mihm, and Novak acknowledge grants to the study from the Steven & Alexandra Cohen Foundation, Global Lyme Alliance, and the Bay Area Lyme Foundation, as well as support from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethics approval

The Institutional Review Board of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine approved this study. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study prior to initiation of any study-related activities.

Consent for publication

The authors affirm that human research participants provided written informed consent for publication of their images in Fig. 1 (panels a through g).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 31 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rebman, A.W., Yang, T., Mihm, E.A. et al. The presenting characteristics of erythema migrans vary by age, sex, duration, and body location. Infection 49, 685–692 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-021-01590-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-021-01590-0

Keywords

Navigation