Tools

Brian V. Lien1, Nolan J. Brown1, Alexander S. Himstead1, Benjamin Z. Ball1, Aileen Guillen1, Nischal Acharya1, Chen Yi Yang1, Ronald Sahyouni2, Mari Perez-Rosendahl3, Russell N. Stitzlein4, Frank P. K. Hsu1
  1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, UCI Medical Center, Orange, United States.
  2. Department of Neurosurgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, United States.
  3. Department of Pathology, University of California, UCI Medical Center, Orange, California, United States.
  4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, UCI Medical Center, Orange, California, United States.

Correspondence Address:
Frank P. K. Hsu
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, UCI Medical Center, Orange, United States.

DOI:10.25259/SNI_768_2020

Copyright: © 2021 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Brian V. Lien1, Nolan J. Brown1, Alexander S. Himstead1, Benjamin Z. Ball1, Aileen Guillen1, Nischal Acharya1, Chen Yi Yang1, Ronald Sahyouni2, Mari Perez-Rosendahl3, Russell N. Stitzlein4, Frank P. K. Hsu1. Surgical management of a rare myxopapillary ependymoma of the gluteal region: A case report. 30-Mar-2021;12:130

How to cite this URL: Brian V. Lien1, Nolan J. Brown1, Alexander S. Himstead1, Benjamin Z. Ball1, Aileen Guillen1, Nischal Acharya1, Chen Yi Yang1, Ronald Sahyouni2, Mari Perez-Rosendahl3, Russell N. Stitzlein4, Frank P. K. Hsu1. Surgical management of a rare myxopapillary ependymoma of the gluteal region: A case report. 30-Mar-2021;12:130. Available from: https://surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint-articles/10679/

Date of Submission
27-Oct-2020

Date of Acceptance
25-Feb-2021

Date of Web Publication
30-Mar-2021

Abstract

Background: Ependymomas are rare tumors originating from neuroepithelial cells lining the wall of the ventricles or central canal of the spinal cord. While these tumors mainly occur within the central nervous system (CNS), there are occasional reports in children and young adult patients with a primary tumor occurrence outside of the CNS. Ependymomas of the sacrococcygeal region have been infrequently described in the literature with no standard of care established. We present a case report and review of the literature regarding this rare entity.

Case Description: A 24-year-old woman presented with right gluteal pain worsened by sitting and a palpable soft tissue mass of the sacrococcygeal region. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 3.7 cm cystic mass centered in the right gluteal region. She underwent a biopsy at an outside institution, with histology revealing myxopapillary ependymoma. The patient was referred to our hospital and underwent an interdisciplinary neurosurgical and orthopedic oncology en bloc resection of the ependymoma, which intraoperatively appeared to originate from the coccygeal nerve.

Conclusion: In the present report, the authors demonstrate that a myxopapillary ependymoma may present as an isolated gluteal mass attached to the coccygeal nerve, without frank CNS involvement. Furthermore, an interdisciplinary approach to surgical resection of this lesion appears to represent an effective treatment modality.

Keywords: Extra central nervous system ependymoma, Extraneural ependymoma, Gluteal ependymoma, Rare ependymoma case, Rare myxopapillary ependymoma

INTRODUCTION

Ependymomas occurring outside of the central nervous system (CNS), otherwise known as extra CNS ependymomas, are extremely uncommon and only occasionally described in the literature, with most reports featuring only one to two cases per institution.[ 49 ] These tumors occur most often in children and young adults and have been described as arising from various locations including the lung, ovary, and sacrococcygeal region (the most common extra CNS site).[ 49 ] Many of these extra CNS ependymomas are myxopapillary (Grade I) ependymomas that are thought to originate from the ependymal cell lining of the central canal of the spinal cord or the ependymal cell clusters of the filum terminale.[ 36 ] Most patients with extra CNS ependymoma of the sacrococcygeal region, including the patient described in this case report, present with a palpable mass upon pelvic or rectal examination.[ 48 ] Furthermore, many patients will exhibit symptoms due to sacral nerve damage, such as bladder dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, decrease ankle reflex, or decreased anal sphincter tone.[ 48 ] Due to the rarity of extra CNS ependymomas, there is no standard of care established, though they are commonly treated with surgical excision and occasionally radiotherapy for recurrent lesions.[ 2 , 49 ] Here, we present a surgical case report for an extra CNS myxopapillary ependymoma presenting as a gluteal mass and a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

In January 2021, we performed a systematic review of three literature databases to identify previous reports of gluteal myxopapillary ependymoma. No time restriction was applied to allow for a comprehensive search. The following search terms were used: (gluteal myxopapillary ependymoma) OR (sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma) OR (coccygeal myxopapillary ependymoma). There were a total of 302 publications: 131 from PubMed, 87 results from Scopus, and 84 results from Web of Science. There were 211 publications after deletion of duplicates. We included all cases of primary myxopapillary ependymoma presenting as a gluteal mass confirmed to have no association with the CNS. Studies were excluded if they were not in English or not journal articles (e.g., conference abstracts).

CASE REPORT

A 24-year-old, otherwise healthy female with a strong family history of cancer (including glioma) presented with gradually worsening right gluteal pain exacerbated by sitting and an enlarging gluteal mass. She denied any back pain, leg pain, focal motor weakness, paresthesias, or bowel/bladder dysfunction. Physical exam revealed no focal neurological deficits. Upon inspection of the buttocks, a mass was observable on the right intergluteal cleft and tender to palpation. The patient underwent a biopsy at an outside institution, which revealed myxopapillary ependymoma, before being referred to our hospital.

Work-up proceeded with full neuro-axis imaging including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and MRI/ computed tomography myelograms of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, which were all unremarkable. Pelvic MRI demonstrated a T2 hyperintense cystic lesion with enhancing septa in the right paramedian gluteal region that measured 3.7 ×1.8 ×3.3 cm. The lesion extended from the posterior cortex of the second coccygeal segment body to the right gluteal cleft skin. There was no evidence of any intrinsic spinal cord component or definite CSF connection to the central canal [ Figure 1 ].


Figure 1:

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging. MRI of pelvis demonstrating soft tissue mass centered within the right hemigluteal region. Sagittal T2-weighted image (a) and axial T1-weighted postcontrast image (b) is shown with arrowheads indicating location of the mass.

 

An interdisciplinary neurosurgical and orthopedic oncology en bloc resection was planned. Intraoperatively, it was noted that the lesion was attached to the left coccygeal nerve. A 2.0 silk tie was secured around the base of the left coccygeal nerve, and it was coagulated and sharply divided ~5 mm proximal to the silk tie. Kerrison rongeurs were used to remove a portion of the coccyx which appeared to be infiltrated with tumor. Intraoperative frozen pathology was consistent with myxopapillary ependymoma with negative margins [ Figure 2 ]. The patient had an uneventful postoperative clinical course. Her case was presented at a multidisciplinary tumor board wherein it was determined that the patient would not benefit from adjuvant treatment and instead should be monitored with serial imaging. At 6 months postoperative follow-up, repeat lumbosacral and pelvic MRIs did not reveal evidence of tumor recurrence or metastatic disease [ Figure 3 ].


Figure 2:

Myxopapillary ependymoma. The tumor is composed of many papillary structures formed by vessels (arrow) encircled by basophilic myxoid material (asterisk) and collars of cuboidal tumor cells (arrowhead) (a) which demonstrate strong GFAP positivity (b).

 

Figure 3:

Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging. MRI of pelvis taken 6 months postoperative demonstrating no evidence of tumor recurrence or metastatic disease to the pelvis. Sagittal T1-weighted postcontrast image (a) and axial T1-weighted postcontrast image (b) shown above.

 

DISCUSSION

Ependymomas are distinct histopathological tumors of the CNS that affects both children and adults.[ 37 ] These tumors are classified into the following subtypes based on the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the CNS: subependymoma (grade I), myxopapillary ependymoma (Grade I), ependymoma (Grade II), ependymoma RELA fusion positive (Grade II or III), and anaplastic ependymoma (Grade III).[ 15 ] Ependymomas in adults most commonly occur in the spine (46%), whereas ependymomas in children are more likely to be found intracranially (90%), especially in the posterior fossa.[ 16 ] Ependymomas of the brain and spinal cord are typically chemotherapy resistant, thus the current standard of care consists of resection and radiotherapy.[ 32 , 37 ] These tumors may be found outside of the CNS as primary tumors or metastases, though both situations are rare.[ 27 , 46 ] It has been hypothesized that ependymal cells in the filum terminale or heterotopic ependymal cell clusters may explain the occurrence of extra CNS ependymomas.[ 28 , 36 ]

In our literature review, we found 38 studies that described 78 unique cases of myxopapillary ependymoma occurring in the sacrococcygeal region without extension into the CNS [ Table 1 ]. These were comprised of 35 case reports involving 1 or 2 patients,[ 1 , 3 , 4 , 6 - 14 , 17 - 19 , 21 - 26 , 28 , 31 , 33 - 35 , 38 - 41 , 43 , 45 , 47 , 48 , 50 ] and 3 case series involving 3–32 patients.[ 5 , 20 , 42 ] There were no comparative trials. Four cases were recurrences and the remaining 74 were new-onset tumors. Excluding the case series by Helwig and Stern (which did not specify exact presentations of each patient),[ 20 ] the most common presenting symptoms were as follows: painless mass (47.8%), enlarging mass (17.4%), painful enlarging mass (10.9%), sensory or motor neuropathy (8.7%), mass with discharge (6.5%), rectal tenesmus and constipation (4.3%), back and hip pain (2.2%), and perirectal discharge only with no mass (2.2%). One patient with a painful mass and purulent drainage presented with a large patch of darkened skin overlying the mass.[ 50 ] While average age at diagnosis was 22 years old, the age ranged from 8 months to 54 years, which suggests this may be considered in the differential diagnosis of any gluteal mass in infants and older adults. Of the 78 patients whose gender was reported, 46 were female (59.0%).


Table 1:

Extra CNS myxopapillary ependymomas presenting as gluteal mass.

 

As demonstrated by our literature review, the exact presentation of sacrococcygeal ependymomas is variable. Given their location and propensity for drainage, they are frequently misdiagnosed as the more frequently encountered pilonidal cyst.[ 35 ] Rectal tenesmus and constipation were reported in cases by Cappabianca et al. and Wani et al. due to compression of the distal rectum by the mass, which narrowed the rectal lumen.[ 8 , 48 ] Quraishi et al. reported a case series of 6 total patients where myxopapillary ependymomas led to osteolytic destruction of the sacrum.[ 38 ] Two of these cases were extra CNS lesions (while the other four originated from the spinal cord), and neurological deficits were reported in each case. Specifically, one patient experienced saddle anesthesia, mild weakness with right hip flexion, and dermatomal paresthesia over the right lower extremity, while the other sustained sensory loss below the bilateral knees.[ 38 ] Cihangiroglu et al. and Gupta et al. also reported extra CNS lesions that invaded the sacrum and caused left lower extremity pain, weakness, and dermatomal paresthesias in one case, and progressive weakness in bilateral lower extremities with bowel and bladder incontinence in the other.[ 11 , 19 ]

We identified 13 cases of recurrence or metastasis out of 78 total cases (16.7%) in the literature. Notably, this number may be artificially low as recurrence typically occurs up to 20 years after initial resection, and several studies reported follow-up of 6 months or less.[ 13 , 22 , 23 , 31 , 39 ] Metastasis rate was previously estimated at up to 20%, and metastatic lesions have been reported in the lungs, pleura, bones, regional subcutaneous tissues, and inguinal lymph nodes.[ 20 , 23 , 26 , 30 ] Metastatic and recurrent disease are associated with poor outcomes; a case series by Helwig and Stern reported the only three mortalities after resection (out of 23 patients with long-term follow-up) were caused by pulmonary and pleural metastatic disease or chemotherapy toxicity for aggressive treatment of intractable local disease recurrence and inguinal lymph node metastases.[ 20 ] The fourth patient had recurrence ultimately leading to marked pulmonary, femoral, and pelvic metastases after a disease-free period of 10 years. One of these patients had pulmonary metastases at time of initial diagnosis. The authors did not identify any clinical or histopathological indications of recurrence or metastasis. These statistics highlight the importance of early detection and close imaging surveillance after surgery to evaluate for recurrent disease.

The primary means of management for sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma is complete surgical resection.[ 19 , 31 ] This entails excision of the mass along with neighboring sacrum or coccyx if they are involved within the tumor. A case series by Aktuğ et al. suggests a role for coccygectomy to prevent recurrence.[ 2 ] They report no recurrences in 4 patients who underwent excision with coccygectomy compared to 5 recurrences out of 7 in patients who underwent simple excision.[ 2 ] Further evidence supporting coccygectomy is provided by Quraishi et al., who reported no recurrences after resection with coccygectomy in 2 patients with extra CNS ependymomas that presented with osteolytic sacral extra CNS ependymomas.[ 38 ] These two patients were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, which is typically utilized in patients with metastatic disease or subtotal resection.[ 23 , 26 , 31 ] However, two cases do report recurrence despite coccygectomy.[ 6 , 42 ] In addition, any lymph nodes involved at time of surgery are removed and radiation therapy is considered as these cases seem to demonstrate a propensity for recurrence.[ 31 , 44 ] However, when complete excision is achieved and no regional lymph node involvement is detected, radiotherapy is deferred to avoid adverse effects.[ 29 ] In terms of excision type, a case series by Sonneland et al. found that en bloc resection was associated with a lower recurrence rate than piecewise resection (10% vs. 19%),[ 44 ] likely due to less seeding of local structures by tumor cells. They also reported higher overall survival in gross total resection compared to subtotal (19 years vs. 14 years).[ 44 ]

Management of subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma is multifaceted and not fully standardized due to rarity of the disease. Our case is unique in that it describes a myxopapillary ependymoma presenting as palpable gluteal mass adherent to the coccygeal nerve and was resected successfully en bloc with a multidisciplinary team. While palpable mass is the most common presenting complaint of this entity, we did not find any reports of extra CNS ependymomas attached to the coccygeal nerve. As the tumor did partially invade the coccyx, partial coccygectomy was performed in order to attain en bloc gross-total resection. No local lymph nodes were involved, and no distant metastases were detected on imaging, so radiotherapy was deferred for the time being. The patient remains without recurrence at 6 months and will continue with long-term surveillance.

Management of subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma is multifaceted and not fully standardized due to rarity of the disease, and we propose that early intervention by a multidisciplinary team involving neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and radiation oncology and long-term radiographic surveillance for disease recurrence is a reasonable treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

We report a rare case of an extra CNS myxopapillary ependymoma in the gluteal region with attachment to the coccygeal nerve. Management of subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma is multifaceted and not fully standardized due to the rarity of the disease. We propose that early intervention by a multidisciplinary team involving neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and radiation oncology, along with long-term radiographic surveillance for disease recurrence is a reasonable treatment strategy.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Akpolat N, Bozlak N, Kazez A, Köseoğullari AA. Sacrococcygeal extraspinal ependymoma: A case report. Turk J Pediatr. 2003. 45: 276-9

2. Aktuğ T, Hakgüder G, Sarioğlu S, Akgür FM, Olguner M, Pabuçcuoğlu U. Sacrococcygeal extraspinal ependymomas: The role of coccygectomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2000. 35: 515-8

3. Alexiou GA, Sfakianos G, Moschovi M, Athanasiadou S, Stefanaki K, Prodromou N. Myxopapillary ependymoma of the sacrococcygeal region presenting as a pilonidal sinus. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2012. 48: 64-65

4. Amin R, Berdan E, Knipstein J, Jarzembowski J, Siddiqui S. Extraspinal sacrococcygeal ependymoma masquerading as sacrococcygeal teratoma in the pediatric patient. Pediatr Surg Int. 2018. 34: 109-12

5. Anderson MS. Myxopapillary ependymomas presenting in the soft tissue over the sacrococcygeal region. Cancer. 1966. 19: 585-90

6. Batich KA, Riedel RF, Kirkpatrick JP, Tong BC, Eward WC, Tan CL. Recurrent extradural myxopapillary ependymoma with oligometastatic spread. Front Oncol. 2019. 9: 1322

7. Botti G, Gravina A, Cremona F, Izzo F, Rigutini M, Picone A. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma: A case report. Eur J Cancer. 1994. 30a: 570-1

8. Cappabianca S, Barberi A, Grassi R, Lieto E, Fulciniti F, Galizia G. Myxopapillary ependymoma of the ischioanal fossa. Br J Radiol. 2003. 76: 659-61

9. Chou S, Soucy P, Carpenter B. Extraspinal ependymoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1987. 22: 802-3

10. Chung JY, Lee SK, Yang KH, Song MK. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999. 20: 344-6

11. Cihangiroglu M, Hartker FW, Lee M, Sehgal V, Ramsey RG. Intraosseous sacral myxopapillary ependymoma and the differential diagnosis of sacral tumors. J Neuroimaging. 2001. 11: 330-2

12. Ciraldo AV, Platt MS, Agamanolis DP, Boeckman CR. Sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymomas and ependymal rests in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg. 1986. 21: 49-52

13. Dogan MS, Collins R, Wang J, Koral K. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal ependymoma in a child. Spine J. 2016. 16: e513-4

14. Domingues R, Mikulis D, Swearingen B, Tompkins R, Rosen B. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma: CT and MR findings. Am J Neuroradiol. 1991. 12: 171-2

15. Fukuoka K, Kanemura Y, Shofuda T, Fukushima S, Yamashita S, Narushima D. Significance of molecular classification of ependymomas: C11orf95-RELA fusion-negative supratentorial ependymomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018. 6: 134

16. Gerstner ER, Pajtler KW. Ependymoma. Semin Neurol. 2018. 38: 104-11

17. Grubnic S, MacVicar D. A perianal problem. Br J Radiol. 1999. 72: 1235-6

18. Gupta R, Rishi A, Suri V, Sharma MC, Gupta A, Garg A. Sacral myxopapillary ependymoma with extensive osteolysis. J Neurooncol. 2008. 86: 349-52

19. Gupta T, Patel V, El-Medani F, Gupta S. An unexpected diagnosis of paediatric subcutaneous sacrococcygeal extraspinal ependymoma: Lessons learnt and review of the literature. J Surg Case Rep. 2020. 2020: rjaa177

20. Helwig EB, Stern JB. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma. A clinicopathologic study of 32 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984. 81: 156-61

21. Ilhan I, Berberoglu S, Kutluay L, Maden HA. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1998. 30: 81-4

22. Inceoğlu R, Ozer F, Pamir N, Küllü S. Extraspinal ependymoma presenting as a subcutaneous mass posterior to the sacrococcygeal region: Case report. Paraplegia. 1993. 31: 800-2

23. Johnson JM, Jessurun J, Leonard A. Sacrococcygeal ependymoma: Case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg. 1999. 34: 1405-7

24. Kelly A, Nally D, Crowther S, Kavanagh D. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma misdiagnosed as pilonidal disease. BMJ Case Rep. 2020. 13: e231639

25. Kline MJ, Kays DW, Rojiani AM. Extradural myxopapillary ependymoma: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med. 1996. 16: 813-22

26. Kramer GW, Rutten E, Sloof J. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal ependymoma with inguinal lymph node metastasis: Case report. J Neurosurg. 1988. 68: 474-7

27. Kumar P, Rastogi N, Jain M, Chhabra P. Extraneural metastases in anaplastic ependymoma. J Cancer Res Ther. 2007. 3: 102-4

28. Lee KJ, Min BW, Seo HJ, Cho CH. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma in asian female: A case report. J Clin Med Res. 2012. 4: 61-3

29. Lemberger A, Stein M, Doron J, Fried G, Goldsher D, Feinsod M. Sacrococcygeal extradural ependymoma. Cancer. 1989. 64: 1156-9

30. Lynch J, Kelly N, Fitzpatrick B, Regan P. A sacrococcygeal extraspinal ependymoma in a 67-year-old man: A case report and review of the literature. Br J Plast Surg. 2002. 55: 80-2

31. Ma YT, Ramachandra P, Spooner D. Case report: Primary subcutaneous sacrococcygeal ependymoma: A case report and review of the literature. Br J Radiol. 2006. 79: 445-7

32. Mack SC, Pajtler KW, Chavez L, Okonechnikov K, Bertrand KC, Wang X. Therapeutic targeting of ependymoma as informed by oncogenic enhancer profiling. Nature. 2018. 553: 101-5

33. Marc’Hadour FL, Pasquier B. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal ependymoma with incidental glomus coccygeum. Histopathology. 1991. 18: 570-2

34. Matsuo K, Kumagai K, Kawai K, Tsuchiyama H. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma: A case report and review of the literatures. Pathol Int. 1985. 35: 925-31

35. McEachron KR, Gaertner WB. Extradural sacrococcygeal subcutaneous ependymoma misdiagnosed as pilonidal disease: Case report and review of the literature. J Surg Case Rep. 2016. 2016: 261369

36. Morantz RA, Kepes JJ, Batnitzky S, Masterson BJ. Extraspinal ependymomas. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg. 1979. 51: 383-91

37. Pajtler KW, Mack SC, Ramaswamy V, Smith CA, Witt H, Smith A. The current consensus on the clinical management of intracranial ependymoma and its distinct molecular variants. Acta Neuropathol. 2017. 133: 5-12

38. Quraishi NA, Wolinsky JP, Bydon A, Witham T, Gokaslan ZL. Giant destructive myxopapillary ependymomas of the sacrum. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010. 12: 154-9

39. Rao IS, Kapila K, Aggarwal S, Ray R, Gupta AK, Verma K. Subcutaneous myxopapillary ependymoma presenting as a childhood sacrococcygeal tumor: A case report. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002. 27: 303-7

40. Rogers S, Jones DT, Ireland A, Gottardo NG, Endersby R. Unusual paediatric spinal myxopapillary ependymomas: Unique molecular entities or pathological variations on a theme?. J Clin Neurosci. 2018. 50: 144-8

41. Sawyer JR, Miller JP, Ellison DA. Clonal telomeric fusions and chromosome instability in a subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998. 100: 169-75

42. Schiavello E, Biassoni V, Antonelli M, Modena P, Cesaro S, Pierani P. Pediatric extraspinal sacrococcygeal ependymoma (ESE): An Italian AIEOP experience of six cases and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018. 34: 1291-8

43. Serour F, Gorenstein A, Finci Y, Zaidel L. Subcutaneous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma. Pediatr Surg Int. 1993. 8: 362-5

44. Sonneland PR, Scheithauer BW, Onofrio BM. Myxopapillary ependymoma. A clinicopathologic and immunocytochemical study of 77 cases. Cancer. 1985. 56: 883-93

45. Vagaiwala MR, Robinson JS, Galicich JH, Gralla RJ, Helson L, Beattie EJ. Metastasizing extradural ependymoma of the sacrococcygeal region: Case report and review of literature. Cancer. 1979. 44: 326-33

46. Vega-Orozco R, Rembao-Bojórquez D, Salmerón-Mercado M, García-Marquez A, Tena-Suck ML. Inguinal lymph nodal metastasis of myxopapillary ependymoma confirmed by fine-needle aspiration cytology, biopsy, and immunohistochemistry: Case report. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011. 39: 689-93

47. Vroobel K, Thway K. Synchronous sacrococcygeal myxopapillary ependymoma and chordoma. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016. 24: 48-50

48. Wani NA, Mir F, Qayum A, Nazir P. Sacrococcygeal extraspinal ependymoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010. 152: 917-8

49. Yust Katz S, Cachia D, Kamiya-Matsuoka C, Olar A, Theeler B, Prado MP. Ependymomas arising outside of the central nervous system: A case series and literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2018. 47: 202-7

50. Zaidi SN, Al-Khalidi H, Al-Rikabi AC. Myxopapillary ependymoma masquerading as subcutaneous sacrococcygeal non-healing ulcer: Case report. Ann Saudi Med. 2014. 34: 262-4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *