ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Incidental finding of didelphys uterus in a multigravida woman at Caesarean delivery

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 13 Jul 2022
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Didelphys uterus is one of the rarest Müllerian duct anomalies (MDA) of the female genital tract. Many remain undiagnosed due to possibilities of successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries in those without or with mild forms of associated cervical and/or vaginal anomalies.  Due to this, data on didelphys uterus in pregnancy are rare, with most cases seen during routine ultrasound in pregnancies’ Caesarean section for other obstetric indications. This case was a 36-year-old G4P1+2 female who had successful vaginal delivery in her preceding pregnancy; in index pregnancy, she presented with fetal footling breech in labour and had an emergency caesarean section during which uterine didelphys was diagnosed. Many pregnant women with didelphys uterus will deliver vaginally and, as such, remain undiagnosed.  Its presence is one of the possible reasons for persistent abnormal presentations like fetal breech presentation, especially in women with prior successful vaginal deliveries. Early recognition and availability of facilities for management of such incidentally found cases of uterine didelphys will prevent many of the complications associated with pregnancy with them.

Keywords

uterine didelphys, pregnancy, caesarean section, breech presentation

Introduction

Müllerian duct abnormalities (MDA) are a spectrum of genital abnormalities arising from failure of fusion of the Müllerian ducts during the embryological stage of development.1 The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies varies and can range between 5.5% in the general population and 24.5% in patients treated for miscarriages and infertility.2 The most common forms of uterine anomalies include unicornuate uterus, bicornuate uterus, arcuate uterus, septate uterus and didelphys uterus. Uterine didelphys belongs to MDA class III as defined by American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). This classification includes adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions that result from failure of Müllerian duct fusion at week eight of gestation.3,4 Though uterine didelphys rarely affects fertility, it is commonly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as recurrent miscarriages, preterm deliveries, intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses, low-birth-weight fetuses, and fetal malpresentations. While many cases will remain undiagnosed until evaluations for other gynaecological conditions,5,6 fetal malpresentation diagnosed during pregnancy or at delivery is one of the commonest indications for Caesarean delivery.7 We present a case of Caesarean section in a multiparous woman with uterine didelphys with breech presentation at term in our obstetric service.

Case

A 36-year-old G4P1+2 1 alive Nigerian of Yoruba ethnicity, presented for antenatal service following spontaneous conception of singleton gestation at gestational age of 17 weeks. She was the third of her parents’ four children, including three females and one male. The older two sister were multiparous with no significant obstetric complaints. Obstetrics scan done at 23 weeks revealed live singleton fetus in breech presentation within the right horn and empty left horn of the uterus (Figure 1). She was regular at clinic visits and her pregnancy period remained uneventful. Four years earlier, she had a vaginal delivery, at term, of a live neonate with a birth weight of 2.95 kg following spontaneous conception after two prior spontaneous pregnancies loss at about six weeks gestation each.

5f9d4dd1-b5cc-4f50-ae1d-e8adf59ed223_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Sonologist impression of the uterine didelphys with pregnancy in the right horn.

Review at the antenatal clinic at 37 weeks revealed fetal cephalic presentation at clinical examination. However, at 38 weeks and four days of gestation she presented in labour and obstetrics examination revealed a singleton fetus in longitudinal lie with footling breech presentation. She subsequently had emergency lower segment Caesarean section and was delivered of a live neonate with a birth weight of 3.75 kg via breech extraction from the right horn, the left horn was bulky and equivalent to about 14 weeks size gestation (Figure 2). Each horn had its adjoining normal looking fallopian tube and ovary. The urinary bladder was grossly normal. Her postoperative period was satisfactory and she was discharged on fourth day after surgery.

5f9d4dd1-b5cc-4f50-ae1d-e8adf59ed223_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Double uteri at caesarean section with suture right horn that contained the fetus (green arrow) and the empty left horn (blue arrow).

Discussion

Congenital malformations of the female genital tract are embryological maldevelopments of the Müllerian or paramesonephric ducts.8,9 The prevalence of genital tract malformations has been reported to vary between 6.0-38%.9,10 In the general population it was reported to range between 5-7%, 7-8% in the infertile population and 16-25% in the recurrent miscarriage and infertile population.1,8,11 Malformations involving the uterus have been reported as the most common MDA with septate uterus being the commonest, and didelphys uterus the rarest.12 In a 15-year retrospective analysis, septate uterus were found in 55.6% of cases of female genital tract anomaly, while uterine didelphys accounted for 22.7% of cases.13 Presentations of genital tract anomalies also vary. In paediatric patients, presentation to emergency services with symptoms of severe abdominal pain, likely associated dysmenorrhea if menarche has been reached, obstructed hemivaginal septa, and abdominal swelling from haematometra with or without haematocolpos, are common.1,14

Congenital malformation of the female genital tract is of special interest in the practice of obstetrics as the obstetrics performance is determined by the type of MDA. Some authors have reported increased risk of first- and second-trimester miscarriages, preterm birth, low birth weight, fetal mal-presentation, and ultimately abdominal delivery with uterine didelphys.15,16 However, there have been many reported cases of successful pregnancies and deliveries in patients with uterine didelphys following appropriate pre-pregnancy surgical correction and appropriate obstetrics interventions like cervical cerclage.1,17 In a prospective multicenter study of 286 pregnant women with uterine didelphys conducted in Saudi Arabia, 5.2% of the women had first trimester abortion, 27.5% had preterm labour which were managed conservatively with all delivering at term and of all delivering at term, 5.9% had spontaneous vaginal delivery, 13.3% had operative vaginal delivery and 80.8% of the women delivered by Caesarean section.18 Our patient had two previous miscarriages prior to her first delivery.

Delivery by Caesarean section is, generally, not primarily indicated in cases of uterine didelphys except for additional obstetric indication.19 In our patient, she had successful vaginal delivery in her previous pregnancy and had Caesarean delivery in index case because of the fetal footling breech presentation at term.

Conclusions

Didelphys uterus is among the rarest of Müllerian duct anomalies and is commonly associated with successful pregnancies outcomes. Many will deliver vaginally and remain undiagnosed, as was the case for the first term pregnancy of the case we presented. However, its presence can be suspected in pregnant women with prior vaginal deliveries now presenting with malpresentations, like persistent fetal breech presentation as seen in this patient. Good antenatal care and management in a facility with adequate obstetric facilities for surgical intervention can prevent complications that can result from undiagnosed cases. This is especially important for cases showing malpresentations as seen in this case of fetal footling breech presentation.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Patient consent

Consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 13 Jul 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Awolude O, Olutoye A and Obajimi G. Case Report: Incidental finding of didelphys uterus in a multigravida woman at Caesarean delivery [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] F1000Research 2022, 11:789 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.123141.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 13 Jul 2022
Views
5
Cite
Reviewer Report 12 Feb 2024
Antonella Vimercati, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari,, Italy 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 5
You present an interesting case of pregnancy in utero didelphys but limited by an insufficient comparison or discussion with the data present in the literature.
  • you should add other recent bibliographical entries on the topic such
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Vimercati A. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Incidental finding of didelphys uterus in a multigravida woman at Caesarean delivery [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:789 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135217.r235209)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 05 Sep 2022
Adepiti Clement Akinfolarin, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, The Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria 
Approved
VIEWS 4
This is a succinctly described case report. It touched essentially on the presentation, examination, diagnosis and treatment. The description and discussion are detailed and have added to the body of knowledge on the subject of MDA. 

However, ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Akinfolarin AC. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Incidental finding of didelphys uterus in a multigravida woman at Caesarean delivery [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:789 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135217.r144392)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 13 Jul 2022
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.